LARP check · Robinhood Chain
$IRIDIUS
$IRIDIUS
Robinhood Chain4 claims read from its site. Its public code at iridiusxyz/contracts was last changed 3 days ago. One working part of it answered our reads; a second kind would make it found.
Read 10 h ago · mcap at check $90.9k · now $90.3k · since check −0.7% · asked 2×
What it says, and what we found
- not read“Each ticket lists the spread and the fee on lines of their own” its sitechainno number to check; tax 2% a trade (chain)
- not found“Half-spread 10 bps Tier A, during the open session” its sitewe could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs this
- not read“Protocol fee 2 bps A separate line on each ticket” its sitechainno per-trade rate of the coin to check (a split share, a router's fee or no rate in its words); tax 2% a trade (chain)
- not found“no fill settles further than 75 bps from the mid” its sitewe could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs this
The claims are their own words, quoted by Claude Haiku 5.5; Claude Sonnet 5.5 checked each result against our evidence and Claude Opus 5.5 had the final say; every check of them is our own read, and chain facts come from the chain.
Working parts we tested
- no answerAPI: no address of its API we tried answered with data (iridius.xyz/api/health, iridius.xyz/api/stats, iridius.xyz/api/status)
- no answerMCP: no MCP server answered at iridius.xyz/mcp, iridius.xyz/api/mcp
- answeredPublic code: its public code at iridiusxyz/contracts was last changed 3 days ago · github.com/iridiusxyz/contracts
- factX account @iridiusxyz: exists (an account is not working tech; it backs no claim)
- readThe page we read: www.iridius.xyz/ (declared at launch)
Holders of 1M $TOLL can re-read this now. Get $TOLL
Claude Opus 5.5 reviewed this read · holders see its notes. Get $TOLL
This dev's other coins we read
None yet: this is the first coin from this dev wallet that we read.
How we read it
We read what the project says in its own words: its website, its code README and its launch post. Each thing it says it offers is listed as a claim. Then we test it ourselves, and only our own reads count: the contracts it names on chain, who calls them and what they actually do; its app; its own API answering with data; its MCP server listing its tools; its x402 payments; its Chrome Web Store listing; its Telegram bot; its public code changed in the last 30 days. An X account that exists is shown as a fact; it never backs a claim.
- product found a contract of theirs is used by wallets other than the team, or two different working parts of theirs answered our reads.
- product partly found one working part of theirs answered, or weaker support (a contract only the team calls, a page of theirs that opens, fresh code).
- product not found we read their words, and nothing we could check backs them.
- product not read we could not read their words (no site or post, a site that did not open, or one that draws itself with scripts).
Facts, not a verdict: a quiet contract can be tech that launched yesterday, and a busy one can still lose you money. Not advice.