LARP check · Robinhood Chain
$FUN
$FUN
Robinhood Chain5 claims read from its site. We could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs it.
Read 6 h ago · mcap at check $14.2k · now $6.11k · since check −57.1%
What it says, and what we found
- not found“Trade tokenized stocks at up to 1000x Long or short tokenized stocks at up to 1000x on Robinhood Chain.” its site0x8ed4…b862, deployed by the dev's wallet, carried no swap in 3 days (chain)
- not found“Trade 24/7 against a shared pool.” its site0x8ed4…b862, deployed by the dev's wallet, carried no swap in 3 days (chain)
- not found“Deposit into the liquidity pool and earn from every trade.” its site0x8ed4…b862, deployed by the dev's wallet, carried no swap in 3 days (chain)
- not found“Tokenized stocks 24/7 on-chain 1000x!” its site0x8ed4…b862, deployed by the dev's wallet, carried no swap in 3 days (chain)
- not found“Built on Robinhood Chain” its site0x8ed4…b862, deployed by the dev's wallet, carried no swap in 3 days (chain)
The claims are their own words, quoted by Claude Haiku 5.5; Claude Sonnet 5.5 checked each result against our evidence; every check of them is our own read, and chain facts come from the chain.
Working parts we tested
- no answerAPI: no address of its API we tried answered with data (funinthehood.com/api/health, funinthehood.com/api/stats, funinthehood.com/api/status)
- no answerMCP: no MCP server answered at funinthehood.com/mcp, funinthehood.com/api/mcp
- factX account @funonrobinhood: exists (an account is not working tech; it backs no claim)
- readThe page we read: funinthehood.com/ (listed on DexScreener and declared at launch)
Holders of 1M $TOLL can re-read this now. Get $TOLL
Claude Sonnet 5.5 reviewed this read · holders see its notes. Get $TOLL
This dev's other coins we read
None yet: this is the first coin from this dev wallet that we read.
How we read it
We read what the project says in its own words: its website, its code README and its launch post. Each thing it says it offers is listed as a claim. Then we test it ourselves, and only our own reads count: the contracts it names on chain, who calls them and what they actually do; its app; its own API answering with data; its MCP server listing its tools; its x402 payments; its Chrome Web Store listing; its Telegram bot; its public code changed in the last 30 days. An X account that exists is shown as a fact; it never backs a claim.
- product found a contract of theirs is used by wallets other than the team, or two different working parts of theirs answered our reads.
- product partly found one working part of theirs answered, or weaker support (a contract only the team calls, a page of theirs that opens, fresh code).
- product not found we read their words, and nothing we could check backs them.
- product not read we could not read their words (no site or post, a site that did not open, or one that draws itself with scripts).
Facts, not a verdict: a quiet contract can be tech that launched yesterday, and a busy one can still lose you money. Not advice.