LARP check · Robinhood Chain
$LOCALLM
$LOCALLM
Robinhood Chain6 claims read from its README and site. We could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs it.
Read 18 h ago · mcap at check — · now — · since check —
What it says, and what we found
- not found“Run any model, LLMs, vision, voice, image and video, on any hardware. No GPU required.” its sitea second reader found the site is not this project's own
- not found“Drop-in replacement for most upstream APIs. One binary with an OpenAI-compatible API in front of it.” its sitea second reader found the site is not this project's own
- not found“Open source · MIT · v4.8.0” its sitea second reader found the site is not this project's own
- not found“Switching is one line in the model's config.” its sitea second reader found the site is not this project's own
- not found“Distance in metres from one ordinary photo, and a full 3D reconstruction from a handful of them.” its sitea second reader found the site is not this project's own
- not found“Each backend wraps a best-in-class engine (llama.cpp, vLLM, whisper.cpp, stable-diffusion, MLX...) in its own image, pulled only when a model needs it.” its READMEa second reader found the site is not this project's own
The claims are their own words, quoted by Claude Haiku 5.5; Claude Sonnet 5.5 checked each result against our evidence and Claude Opus 5.5 had the final say; every check of them is our own read, and chain facts come from the chain.
Working parts we tested
- no answerAPI: no address of its API we tried answered with data (localai.io/v1/systemone, localai.io/api/health, localai.io/api/stats)
- no answerMCP: no MCP server answered at localai.io/mcp, localai.io/api/mcp
- no answerPublic code: its public code at mudler/LocalAI was last changed 0 days ago · github.com/mudler/LocalAI
- factX account @LocalAI_API: exists (an account is not working tech; it backs no claim)
- readThe page we read: localai.io/ (declared at launch)
Holders of 1M $TOLL can re-read this now. Get $TOLL
Claude Opus 5.5 reviewed this read · holders see its notes. Get $TOLL
This dev's other coins we read
None yet: this is the first coin from this dev wallet that we read.
How we read it
We read what the project says in its own words: its website, its code README and its launch post. Each thing it says it offers is listed as a claim. Then we test it ourselves, and only our own reads count: the contracts it names on chain, who calls them and what they actually do; its app; its own API answering with data; its MCP server listing its tools; its x402 payments; its Chrome Web Store listing; its Telegram bot; its public code changed in the last 30 days. An X account that exists is shown as a fact; it never backs a claim.
- product found a contract of theirs is used by wallets other than the team, or two different working parts of theirs answered our reads.
- product partly found one working part of theirs answered, or weaker support (a contract only the team calls, a page of theirs that opens, fresh code).
- product not found we read their words, and nothing we could check backs them.
- product not read we could not read their words (no site or post, a site that did not open, or one that draws itself with scripts).
Facts, not a verdict: a quiet contract can be tech that launched yesterday, and a busy one can still lose you money. Not advice.