LARP check · Robinhood Chain
$CONCLAVE
$CONCLAVE
Robinhood Chain5 claims read from its site (read with a sandboxed browser). We could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs it.
Read 7 h ago · mcap at check $17.4k · now $16.0k · since check −7.7%
What it says, and what we found
- not found“Every hour the AI picks a coin, holders make their calls, and the AI trades it.” its sitewe could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs this
- found“Every win burns your supply” its sitechainits team's wallets burned 28,506,002 $CONCLAVE in 5 burns in the last 30 days, the last today, and bought it 5 times (chain)
- not read“You earn 20% of your coin's fees, paid to your wallet automatically.” its sitechainno per-trade rate of the coin to check (a split share, a router's fee or no rate in its words); tax 2% a trade (chain)
- not found“When the AI wins, the callers who got it right get paid.” its sitewe could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs this
- not found“cash out your winnings privately in Monero or Zcash” its sitewe could not find a contract, a working app or recent code of its own that backs this
The claims are their own words, quoted by Claude Haiku 5.5; Claude Sonnet 5.5 checked each result against our evidence; every check of them is our own read, and chain facts come from the chain.
Working parts we tested
- no answerAPI: conclave.markets/api/health answered only a health check, which shows nothing · conclave.markets/api/health
- no answerMCP: no MCP server answered at conclave.markets/mcp, conclave.markets/api/mcp
- factX account @conclavemarkets: exists (an account is not working tech; it backs no claim)
- readThe page we read: conclave.markets/ (declared at launch)
Holders of 1M $TOLL can re-read this now. Get $TOLL
Claude Sonnet 5.5 reviewed this read · holders see its notes. Get $TOLL
This dev's other coins we read
None yet: this is the first coin from this dev wallet that we read.
How we read it
We read what the project says in its own words: its website, its code README and its launch post. Each thing it says it offers is listed as a claim. Then we test it ourselves, and only our own reads count: the contracts it names on chain, who calls them and what they actually do; its app; its own API answering with data; its MCP server listing its tools; its x402 payments; its Chrome Web Store listing; its Telegram bot; its public code changed in the last 30 days. An X account that exists is shown as a fact; it never backs a claim.
- product found a contract of theirs is used by wallets other than the team, or two different working parts of theirs answered our reads.
- product partly found one working part of theirs answered, or weaker support (a contract only the team calls, a page of theirs that opens, fresh code).
- product not found we read their words, and nothing we could check backs them.
- product not read we could not read their words (no site or post, a site that did not open, or one that draws itself with scripts).
Facts, not a verdict: a quiet contract can be tech that launched yesterday, and a busy one can still lose you money. Not advice.